United SIBLINGS ARE A FAMILY

Dividing biological siblings to solve adult infertility is child abuse and exploitation

Photos and Videos

Photos and Videos are a very telling story. We all enjoy watching our kids’ photos and videos. Vedant and Medhavi have one common biological parent. They both look like each other. They must get it from the blood parent. Its a bond that goes on for a lifetime.

When Vedant and Medhavi see their kid pictures and videos, they will instantly bond. There is something magical about bloodlines. They will both wonder why they were not allowed to grow up together with their biological family? Vedant and Medhavi are NOT assets. They are human beings and deserve to be treated as such. We store these pictures and videos like any parents, we will share with them their kid videos and photos at an appropriate age. The question is will they have kid photos and videos where both are together?

There is every intention to have a sibling for each other. Medhavi, Vedant’s sister, was born after 3 failed IVF attempts. Infertility is very traumatic and IVF is supposed to soften the blow, not complicate it. Medhavi was abandoned, did Vedant abandon his little sister? Then were are Vedant’s and Medhavi’s rights as siblings? The current situation of them NOT being able to meet is worse than the trauma experienced by infertile adult.

It is widely known that kids when they grow up will seek out their biological parent. In this case, Vedant knows who the father is. Vedant knows who his biological sister is. Vedant knows who his biological grandparents are. It is simply inevitable, Vedant will seek us out. There is not a moment that goes by when we don’t think about Vedant.

Vedant is not just a son to his father. As an infant and later a toddler he has been a listener to Maulik’s sorrows, pain and grief. Vedant is the being why Maulik survived and he could go on. Vedant is the being why Medhavi is born. Vedant is so tightly connected in our family fabric that our love will bring him to us. It is simply inevitable.

We have not included the videos here because it is just too emotional. The similarities between the siblings is choking us because of the current situation.

SEPARATOMETER

6108 days 21 hours 30 minutes 36 seconds since we have NEVER met.

%%wppa%% %%slide=6%% %%size=300%%

%%wppa%% %%slide=5%% %%size=300%%

Equal IVF Child Rights

Dear Friends and Fellow Americans,

1) Have international IVF/surrogacy laws (maybe through UN?) to protect and ensure equal HUMAN rights treatment for each participant in an IVF cycle including donors, surrogates and innocent IVF children.

It is understood that the US Immigration Laws are an internal matter to the US but US is a world leader and we expect nothing less than strong leadership and support for equal rights for innocent IVF children and IVF families from the US. This is about CHILD RIGHTS. This is about HUMAN RIGHTS. The same bioethical reasons why human cloning is banned, placing innocent IVF children in a LEGAL LIMBO is wrong; they did not ask to be born. Do car manufacturers make cars that cannot be driven on the road safely? Then why does IVF industry "produce" IVF babies that are placed in LEGAL LIMBO?

2) The US Immigration law for IVF parents who are US citizens:
We are asking for two changes in US Immigration Law (7 FAM 1131.4 and 7 FAM 1131.5 and its sub-sections) that deals with IVF :
a) Change the phrase from "biological mother/father" to "parent".
b) Change the phrase from "child born out of wedlock" to "child born". If IVF children are "born out of wedlock" during a marriage, then what is the validity of the marriage? It gets very confusing and seems the laws are contradictory. If IVF children are deemed to be "born out of wedlock", are we implicitly taking away their legal rights of being "born in a marriage"? For example, a sister's legal right to grow up with a brother or a brother's legal right to grow up with a sister?
3) The applicable US Immigration law for IVF fathers on US green card: We are asking for a change of one word - from "mother" to "parent" as cited in 9 FAM 42.1 N2.1 and 9 FAM 42.1 N1.1. This would allow an IVF father legally on US green card to bring a child born outside the US though an egg donor and surrogate and thus have “NO LEGAL MOTHER” to meet US law requirements.

4) Family Laws – If a US couple has an ongoing IVF pregnancy, it must be mandatory to declare the IVF pregnancy to the court like a natural pregnancy in the event of a divorce so that the BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD can be ascertained by the court. Suppressing information from the court is a crime. The rights of an innocent IVF child in a foreign country of a US couple are directly placed in a LEGAL LIMBO.

5) Left-behind IVF child law - The needs of an IVF child are NO DIFFERENT than a natural born child. An IVF child also needs love, care, clothes, food, shelter, books, toys, education, and so on. If an intended parent abandons an IVF pregnancy or IVF child in a foreign country, they should be held accountable and responsible because the IVF child’s needs are EQUAL. If female foeticide or female infanticide is a crime, why is abandoning an IVF child NOT a crime or have NO LEGAL repurcusions? Is an IVF child LESS of a child than a natural born child? An IVF child is not an unwanted pregnancy but a deliberate pregnancy to bring an innocent life into this world. Why abandon with NO accountability or responsibility?

6) Legal recourse for lapses – In cases where the fertility clinic lapses like accidentally swapping samples there should be a legal recourse. In this case, a DNA test would be negative but what if the intended parents still want to bring an IVF child born outside the US back to the US and raise them? It is traumatic enough to deal with infertility and the trauma only continues when there are serious lapses like switching samples of the biological parent.

7) Debate on Parentage – Define clearly on parentage of the child including issuance of legal documents like birth certificate. A valid birth certificate is a fundamental right of the CHILD and not the parents. It is a document that the child carries for life including adulthood. As the technology evolves, (Link Is : "Three-Parent IVF" Up For Public Consultation In Britain : http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/250343.php) it is possible to have a “three parent IVF child” where the DNA is from three parents. What will be the legal impact of this?

8) Public Service –
a) Just like there are public service announcements through radio advertisements, etc. to educate and spread awareness about adoption and its legalities, there should be similar public service campaigns for IVF families.

b) Just like there are travel advisories for US citizens to risky regions, there should be IVF/surrogacy advisories for US citizens of countries that uphold basic IVF child rights and basic human rights of the IVF industry like donors and surrogates.

[signature]

Texas Board Certified Houston Family Law Attorney Becky Reitz – A Texan Girl Child Deleter

Texas Board Certified Houston Family Law Attorney Adam Morris – A Texan Girl Child Deleter

Immigrant Texas Intersex Adult Niti Atre Forced Girl Child, A Sister Into Slavery for 6+ Years in India by Knowingly Making Her Stateless

Global Warming is to Polar Bears and Unregulated Global Surrogacy is to Stateless Outsourced Children

SurrogacyGate : Maybe the innocent children and siblings have their “own best interest”?

Is Texas Being Forced into a Kangaroo Court for Surrogacy Children in the Wild West of Surrogacy?

21st Century – What is IVF/Surrogacy Terrorism?

BPO Vs. BFO – Why not equal humane treatment?

Machiavellian Fertility Wars – What is the Best Interest of the Child?

Whose stateless child survivor would you rather be – ISIS or international IVF/Surrogacy? Or neither?